Rhonda's Blog                    
 
Mainpage Disclaimer

Wed, 08 Feb 2012

Squeeze RCs's Squashing 2012 #2

This is the second entry in my series about squeeze release critical bug squashing. In response to my last blog post it was asked whether this is proper release critical bug squashing. Indeed there haven't been any patches or upload involved in this, only BTS handling, but this doesn't mean that these bugs weren't considered to be affecting squeeze. You can see this effort currently as weeding out the "wrong" bugs so that the list gets more useful and actually be able to ask maintainers to address the real issues.

You can at least see in this graph that the blue line is going down constantly since the year change instead of rising up like before. And I hope I will be able to keep it below the green line for a while still. Also thanks to the release-team and ftpmasters that it was possible to keep the massbugs about waf binary blob not being preferred source for modification out of affecting squeeze and ignore it for the current stable release—the required changes for those would rather be a fair bit intrusive for a stable update.

  • 637213: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 648989: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 584568: most stuff (BTS, PTS, ...) use maintainer information from unstable only
  • 624464: most stuff (BTS, PTS, ...) use maintainer information from unstable only
  • 632106: most stuff (BTS, PTS, ...) use maintainer information from unstable only
  • 632108: most stuff (BTS, PTS, ...) use maintainer information from unstable only
  • 632262: most stuff (BTS, PTS, ...) use maintainer information from unstable only
  • 632264: most stuff (BTS, PTS, ...) use maintainer information from unstable only
  • 632265: most stuff (BTS, PTS, ...) use maintainer information from unstable only
  • 632266: most stuff (BTS, PTS, ...) use maintainer information from unstable only
  • 595298: squeeze has linux 2.6.32
  • 613732: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 616694: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 620264: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 620573: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 621440: libdb4.8 not obsolete in squeeze
  • 624593: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 626868: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 628475: libdb4.8 not obsolete in squeeze
  • 629838: boost1.46 not in squeeze
  • 628475: boost1.46 not in squeeze
  • 631623: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 639990: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 632763: no libevent 2.0 in squeeze
  • 627000: not affecting squeeze
  • 658216: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 654870: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 655115: this is explicitly about testing
  • 657092: working in squeeze
  • 655710: doesn't fail in squeeze
  • 644691: no nautilus 3 in squeeze

I am glad that I managed to keep it up and even have a nice margin in case I can't put any effort into it some day but still have more bugs squashed than days there are in the year so far. Currently I am at 60 bugs in 39 days. This gives a warm feeling. :)

Enjoy!

/debian | permanent link | Comments: 3

Trackbacks are closed for this story.

Jonathan wrote at 2012-02-08 09:58:

Thanks very much for this work, which makes it a lot easier to find bugs to work on with a patch or upload for stable.

simon wrote at 2012-02-08 11:51:

wow, cool stuff. good job. thank you :)

i'm sure everyone who sees this will be impressed with the work you did, and continue to do.

i just happen to stumble on this from the debian list at identi.ca, fyi.

davids wrote at 2012-02-08 12:35:

go, rhonda, go!

OXO

Comments are closed for this story.


 
Feeds
If you want to syndicate this blog, feel free to do so.
This list contains the feeds that I follow:

 
Calendar
February
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
     
8
     

2012
Months
Feb

 
About
©opyright 1999++ by Rhonda
[rss feed]

[html by vim] [graphics by gimp]

[generated by wml]

[powered by blosxom]